I don't have any examples to provide, but I would highly recommend reading through Rich's essay on Identity and State: https://clojure.org/about/state
Bobby On Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 12:43:00 AM UTC-5, Michael Nardell wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 4:56:24 PM UTC-8, Christopher Small > wrote: > > You may be right about an object-oriented approach being the most natural >> here. But, I'd encourage you to keep an open mind. Clojure has this >> particular way of encouraging you to and rewarding you for describing your >> problem domain in terms of pain data, and writing program logic as (mostly) >> pure functions around that data. >> > > Chris :: Thanks, I am hoping that you are foretelling the path I will end > up following. That I start with an object approach, because that is what I > am familiar with and have used in the past. Then find new ways of thinking > about the problem through through functional and Clojure programming. I > think a good starting point, is as you recommend, substitute maps for > objects in my thinking in the problem domain. I can see that I could > actually set-up the simulation just so, and I will have completely captured > the model, frozen at time t=0. Then my challenge is to write a set of > functions that will transition the model to time t+1. At that point I am > done. > > Mike > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
