On Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 3:41:34 PM UTC-6, Nathan Fisher wrote: > > > Not sure I would want to see duplicates either. If my code breaks because > of an old dependency I’d rather that than make the false assumption that > I’m running securely with the latest version of a lib. >
Encountering duplicate libs in the transitive tree is common to almost every dependency trees (for example, it's typical to see multiple versions of Clojure as a dependency in *every* transitive tree). clj, like every other dependency tool, will continue to make choices about which version to include and tools to control which one is included. I do plan to add better tools to understand the tree and the choices made. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
