On Jan 5, 2018, at 8:01 PM, Gary Verhaegen <gary.ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about simply having the producer put items one by one on the channel? I will do that. My current producer is doing too many other things, but if I break it up into separate threads or go blocks for each work queue, then that should work. Thank you. On Saturday, January 6, 2018 at 8:22:34 AM UTC-5, Brian J. Rubinton wrote: > > I think the behavior in our examples differ because the blocking puts will > complete whenever there is a take and the buffer is not full, ignoring > whether the transducer is still outputting values. This bug may be > relevant, though there it arises in a less common scenario (fixed buffer of > size 0, which is now disallowed) > https://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/ASYNC-140 > So, should I report this as a bug? If you have channel with a buffer and a (mapcat identity) transducer, the number of items in the channel can grow without bound. I thought channels were supposed to prevent that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
