A friend, Mike Easter, told me about a podcast on transactional memory that he really found valuable. After listening to it, I agree and felt I should pass it on.
http://www.se-radio.net/podcast/2007-09/episode-68-dan-grossman-garbage-collection-and-transactional-memory After listening to this it struck me that perhaps "dosync" should be named "atomic" or "dotxn" or "dostm". I doubt that name will change at this point though. When I first saw "dosync" I thought of a synchronized block in Java. Of course it's not like that at all. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
