On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 11:11:27 PM UTC-6, Didier wrote: > > | One option is to use the non-conforming s/every instead of the > conforming s/coll-of > > Why isn't instrument just validating for all spec? Doesn't conform serve > no purpose here? >
Indeed, this could probably be changed now. Originally, instrumentation would validate :ret and :fn specs too and the fn spec took the conformed args and ret values. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
