2017-11-14 15:33 GMT+01:00 Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com>: > Although it looks like that call is intentionally reflective to cover > several possible types. Probably need to solve that with a cond to check > for and hint the actual type at the point of the call. >
Yep, see the corresponding change in data.xml: https://github.com/clojure/data.xml/commit/ef8d0c816fa8d9c02d759de990bdb2e0042c0d2a#diff-2a9e7af9410568bc9667e92c2a4227c4R126 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
