I don’t think anyone addressed your question about finding all the indices in a 
vector where the element matches a given search value?

There are a number of ways to tackle that (given it’s going to be a linear 
search). Since you want the indices, you are either going to need to track them 
directly or use map-indexed to produce them automatically.

(defn indices [x l] ; produces a vector
  (loop [i 0 l l r []]
    (if (seq l)
      (recur (inc i) (rest l) (if (= x (first l)) (conj r i) r))
      r)))

(defn indices [x l] ; produces a lazy sequence
  (keep identity (map-indexed (fn [i v] (when (= x v) i)) l)))

(defn indices [x l] ; produces a vector
  (transduce (comp (map-indexed vector)
                   (filter (comp (partial = x) second))
                   (map first))
             conj
             []
             l))

Hopefully that’ll give you some options to think about…

Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

________________________________
From: clojure@googlegroups.com <clojure@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Stephen 
Feyrer <stephen.fey...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 5:19:32 PM
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Map Keywords are functions, why not vector elements?

Hi Alex, Didier,

Thanks for your patience.

That covers everything which I can think of and a fair bit more :)  I have a 
bit of reading and thinking to do now.

Again, thank you.


--
Rule of thumb simple question, complicated answer

Stephen.

On 13 November 2017 at 22:09, Didier 
<didi...@gmail.com<mailto:didi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yo are looking for indexOf (.indexOf vector value).

(.indexOf ["a" "b"] "b")
=> 1

(.indexOf ["a" "b" "b"] "b")
=> 1

Note how indexOf searches for the index of the first value which matches value.

To do what you ask, is a query over a vector, which requires a search on each 
element. This will take O(N) time. For a small list like in your example its 
probably good enough and not an issue.

If you want the name of the horse in a given position, that's a key lookup, 
which is ~O(1) time. You can use get:

(get ["a" "b"] 1)
=> "b"

If you really needed performance, you would need to combine a LinkedList and a 
map. Some datastructures do it for you under the hood, like Apache LinkedMap, 
amalloy ordered, java LinkedHashMap, etc.

Its possible to also just use sorted-map-by in a closure. But this only works 
if you're not going to add/update things to the datastructure after first 
creation.

See the example on clojuredocs: 
https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/sorted-map-by#example-542692d5c026201cdc327094

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to 
clojure@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to