Hi. 1.9.0-beta4 works great for the Tupelo library on java 1.8, but I get the following warnings using Java 9.0.1:
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by dynapath.defaults$eval380$fn__381 to method java.net.URLClassLoader.addURL(java.net.URL) WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of dynapath.defaults$eval380$fn__381 WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release lein test tst.tupelo._bootstrap --------------------------------------- Clojure 1.9.0-beta4 Java 9.0.1 --------------------------------------- Is Clojure 1.9 intended to be compatible with Java 9? Alan On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Didier <didi...@gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW, bigdec? seemed to fit better, given bigdec as a coercion and >> BigDecimal as the underlying type – decimal? always seemed like the anomaly. >> > > Thought so too, but since there's no small decimal, or any other decimal, > its survivable. Though it does get a bit confusing, especially since int? > exclude bigint, for which you have to use integer?, which gets very > confusing if that includes or not biginteger. > > My conclusion is, its already all a bit of a mess, so maybe the broken > window principle applies here (even though that principle is actually to > say broken windows are not a good reason to break more of them, but...). > > On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 08:21:50 UTC-7, Sean Corfield wrote: >> >> Aside from needing to change bigdec? to decimal? in four places in our >> code, testing with Beta 4 has not shown any problems so we’ll probably go >> to production with it early next week. >> >> >> >> FWIW, bigdec? seemed to fit better, given bigdec as a coercion and >> BigDecimal as the underlying type – decimal? always seemed like the anomaly. >> >> >> >> Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN >> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ >> >> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." >> -- Margaret Atwood >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* clo...@googlegroups.com <clo...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of >> Alex Miller <al...@puredanger.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:24:04 AM >> *To:* Clojure >> *Subject:* [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-beta4 >> >> Clojure 1.9.0-beta4 is now available. >> >> Try it via >> >> - Download: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure >> /1.9.0-beta4 >> - Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-beta4"] >> >> 1.9.0-beta4 includes the following changes since 1.9.0-beta3: >> >> - CLJ-2259 <https://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-2259> - Remove >> unnecessary bigdec? predicate added in 1.9 >> - Bumped spec.alpha dependency to 0.1.143 >> >> We would appreciate anything you can do to try out this release. We do >> not plan to make any further changes prior to 1.9.0 release unless >> regressions are found. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
