Sorry, this is the problem with working all night. My sleep deprived eyes
skipped over this line:
old-field-value (get old-documents field-name [])
I fetch the value from the wrong map. Such a basic error.
On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 1:44:13 PM UTC-4, lawrence...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> I should remove the parens before they confuse anyone. They are added by
> the log statement. Without the parens:
>
>
>
> {:company_profile_id ["2"], :topic :company, :url ["mikeshawauto.com"]}
>
> field-name:
> :company_profile_id
>
> field-value:
> ["2"]
>
> but I in the final document I only get:
>
> "final document: " {:company_profile_id ["2"], :topic :company, :url ["
> mikeshawauto.com"]}
>
> I want:
>
> "final document: " {:company_profile_id ["2" "2"], :topic :company, :url ["
> mikeshawauto.com"]}
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 1:42:12 PM UTC-4, lawrence...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> So I tried this:
>>
>> new-field-value (into [] (concat old-field-value
>> field-value))
>>
>> And I did not get what I expected. Maybe I am sleep deprived, but I don't
>> see why I can't build up a vector with several values. This is in a map in
>> an atom. This is the code:
>>
>> (swap! documents
>> (fn [old-documents]
>> (let [
>> document (get old-documents denormalized-id {})
>>
>> _ (errors/log document)
>> _ (errors/log field-name)
>> _ (errors/log field-value)
>>
>> old-field-value (get old-documents field-name [])
>> new-field-value (into [] (concat old-field-value
>> field-value))
>> document (assoc document field-name new-field-value)
>>
>> _ (errors/log "final document: " document)
>> new-documents (assoc old-documents denormalized-id
>> document)
>> ]
>> new-documents)
>>
>> Those log statements show me this for old-field-value:
>>
>> ({:company_profile_id ["2"], :topic :company, :url ["mikeshawauto.com"]})
>>
>> field-name:
>> (:company_profile_id)
>>
>> field-value:
>> (["2"])
>>
>> but I in the final document I only get:
>>
>> ("final document: " {:company_profile_id ["2"], :topic :company, :url ["
>> mikeshawauto.com"]})
>>
>> I want:
>>
>> ("final document: " {:company_profile_id ["2", "2"], :topic :company,
>> :url ["mikeshawauto.com"]})
>>
>> What am I missing here?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 12:28:59 PM UTC-4,
>> lawrence...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> So I have this:
>>>
>>> ({:company_profile_id ["2"], :topic :company, :url ["mikeshawauto.com
>>> "]})
>>>
>>> And then I get this field name and value:
>>>
>>> (:company_profile_id)
>>>
>>> (["2"])
>>>
>>> The next 3 lines of code are:
>>>
>>> old-field-value (get old-documents field-name [])
>>> new-field-value (into old-field-value field-value)
>>> document (assoc document field-name new-field-value)
>>>
>>> And when the function is next called, I end up with :
>>>
>>> ({:company_profile_id ["2"], :topic :company, :url ["mikeshawauto.com
>>> "]})
>>>
>>> I need:
>>>
>>> ({:company_profile_id ["2", "2"], :topic :company, :url ["
>>> mikeshawauto.com"]})
>>>
>>> So perhaps I've misunderstood what (into) is for? How do I add another
>>> the values of these 2 vectors together?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 12:20:55 PM UTC-4,
>>> lawrence...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Using conj instead of into, for no particular reason, except debugging.
>>>> The document is slowly built-up:
>>>>
>>>> ({:company_profile_id [["2"]], :topic :company, :url [["
>>>> mikeshawauto.com"]]})
>>>>
>>>> ({:company_profile_id [["2"]], :topic :company, :url [["
>>>> mikeshawauto.com"]]})
>>>>
>>>> ({:company_profile_id [["2"]], :topic :company, :url [["
>>>> mikeshawauto.com"]], :reference_id [["331089191"]]})
>>>>
>>>> In the transition from row 1 to row 2, I assume the field being added
>>>> is company_profile_id. Why is there no change? Why isn't a new value added
>>>> to the vector? I must be missing something obvious.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 11:44:40 AM UTC-4,
>>>> lawrence...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I seem unable to figure out where I made a mistake, though this should
>>>>> be simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have two SQL calls that bring back 5 fields:
>>>>>
>>>>> SELECT company_profile_id , reference_id, reference_source FROM
>>>>> company_reference_id limit 1 ;
>>>>>
>>>>> +--------------------+--------------+------------------+
>>>>> | company_profile_id | reference_id | reference_source |
>>>>> +--------------------+--------------+------------------+
>>>>> | 2 | 331089191 | EIN |
>>>>> +--------------------+--------------+------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> SELECT company_profile_id, url FROM company_website
>>>>> limit 1 ;
>>>>>
>>>>> +--------------------+------------------+
>>>>> | company_profile_id | url |
>>>>> +--------------------+------------------+
>>>>> | 2 | mikeshawauto.com |
>>>>> +--------------------+------------------+
>>>>>
>>>>> This brings back a total of 5 values. I need to have a document that
>>>>> has 5 values, though if values have the same field-name, then I want to
>>>>> consolidate them into one vector. There are 4 unique field names, so I
>>>>> expect to end up with 4 vectors, holding 5 values. Instead, I get this:
>>>>>
>>>>> ({:company_profile_id ["2"], :topic :company,
>>>>> :how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database 13, :url ["mikeshawauto.com"],
>>>>> :reference_id ["331089191"], :reference_source ["ein"]})
>>>>>
>>>>> I expect:
>>>>>
>>>>> {:company_profile_id ["2" "2"]
>>>>>
>>>>> but I get:
>>>>>
>>>>> {:company_profile_id ["2"]
>>>>>
>>>>> The documents are combined in a map in an atom, with this function:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (def documents (atom {}))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (defn update-documents
>>>>> [denormalized-id field-name field-value
>>>>> how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database topic]
>>>>> {:pre [
>>>>> (not (nil? denormalized-id))
>>>>> (not (nil? field-name))
>>>>> (vector? field-value)
>>>>> ]}
>>>>> (swap! documents
>>>>> (fn [old-documents]
>>>>> (slingshot/try+
>>>>> (let [
>>>>> document (get old-documents denormalized-id {})
>>>>> old-field-value (get old-documents field-name [])
>>>>> new-field-value (into old-field-value field-value)
>>>>> document (assoc document field-name new-field-value)
>>>>>
>>>>> previous-how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database (get
>>>>> document :how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database 0)
>>>>> new-how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database (+
>>>>> previous-how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database
>>>>> how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database)
>>>>> document (assoc document :topic topic)
>>>>> document (assoc document
>>>>> :how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database
>>>>> new-how-many-rows-and-fields-from-database)
>>>>> new-documents (assoc old-documents denormalized-id
>>>>> document)
>>>>> ]
>>>>> new-documents)
>>>>> (catch Object o
>>>>> (errors/log o)
>>>>> (slingshot/throw+ {
>>>>> :type ::update-documents
>>>>> :error o
>>>>> }
>>>>> ))))))
>>>>>
>>>>> Can I assume that this always gives me 2 values in a vector?
>>>>>
>>>>> old-field-value (get old-documents field-name [])
>>>>> new-field-value (into old-field-value field-value)
>>>>> document (assoc document field-name new-field-value)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to guess that the bug is somewhere else in my code. But if
>>>>> anyone sees a flaw in this function, I'd be grateful if you could point
>>>>> it
>>>>> out to me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
