On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Dan <redalas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure structs are only appropriate for when you need to eek > > the absolute last iota of performance out of a collection, in which case > > they can provide greater speed than maps. But since the list of keys is > > fixed, it means it's more effort to add or rename a key than it is with > > a map. > > Not really, I can assoc and dissoc as I wish and leave blank values I > wish. Any function can treat it as a map. >
Close... you can assoc new keys into a struct instance, but you can't dissoc any of the basis keys. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
