I’ll do my usual “We’re using <insert alpha version of Clojure> in production and it’s fine!” post.
We’ve had 1.9.0-alpha17 in production for a while now. Zero problems. We’re also using clojure.spec.alpha very heavily in production (for REST API parameter validation and coercion, mostly), as well as development/testing (to a lesser extent). Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood From: Gary Trakhman Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 10:22 AM To: clojure@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Is Clojure victim of Spec ? I consider Clojure 1.9-alpha16 reasonably stable and not significantly more full-featured than 1.8. Is there any risk to using it, or any harm from staying on 1.8? In the past, conversations have come up about clojure's relative stability in alpha versions compared to people's perceptions of versions and risk tolerance from other ecosystems. Besides the pain from the split of spec, does anyone know if there are any remaining major changes planned to 1.9? On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:53 PM Rafik NACCACHE <rafik.nacca...@gmail.com> wrote: Hey guys, Seems to be a long while we are waiting for 1.9 I kinda feel that core.spec seems to always need more polishing so that's why it's still being delayed... Am I right ? -- Rafik Naccache about.me/rafik_naccache -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.