I’ll do my usual “We’re using <insert alpha version of Clojure> in production 
and it’s fine!” post.

We’ve had 1.9.0-alpha17 in production for a while now. Zero problems.

We’re also using clojure.spec.alpha very heavily in production (for REST API 
parameter validation and coercion, mostly), as well as development/testing (to 
a lesser extent).

Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

From: Gary Trakhman
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 10:22 AM
To: clojure@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Is Clojure victim of Spec ?

I consider Clojure 1.9-alpha16 reasonably stable and not significantly more 
full-featured than 1.8.  Is there any risk to using it, or any harm from 
staying on 1.8?  

In the past, conversations have come up about clojure's relative stability in 
alpha versions compared to people's perceptions of versions and risk tolerance 
from other ecosystems.  

Besides the pain from the split of spec, does anyone know if there are any 
remaining major changes planned to 1.9?

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:53 PM Rafik NACCACHE <rafik.nacca...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
Hey guys,

Seems to be a long while we are waiting for 1.9

I kinda feel that core.spec seems to always need more polishing so that's why 
it's still being delayed... Am I right ?

-- 
 

 
Rafik Naccache
about.me/rafik_naccache


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to