I think that paper is from 2015. Curious to hear what are people's thoughts as to why it didn't replace Clojure's HAMT. I wouldn't mind a free 3x performance boost and a reduced memory footprint. Is it just a matter of didn't have someone doing the work, or did it turn out that there was issues with CHAMP that would prevent Clojure's default core data structures from being migrated to it?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.