I think that paper is from 2015. Curious to hear what are people's thoughts as 
to why it didn't replace Clojure's HAMT. I wouldn't mind a free 3x performance 
boost and a reduced memory footprint. Is it just a matter of didn't have 
someone doing the work, or did it turn out that there was issues with CHAMP 
that would prevent Clojure's default core data structures from being migrated 
to it?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to