I see a lot of let* in macro expansions, but Clojure's "let" already behaves like Common Lisp's LET*. Is let* archaic? It seems to behave the same as "let" in terms of sequential binding. (let [x 8 y (inc x)] (list x y)) => (8 9) (let* [x 8 y (inc x)] (list x y)) => (8 9)
Aloha, David Sletten --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
