Who polices ClojureDocs? If someone adds a silly or simply incorrect example, does someone eventually remove it? Are there ever spam-like "examples"? Or are Clojure fans all good, thoughtful, careful people who never make foolish mistakes?
I'm curious because I see no sign that anyone polices ClojureDocs, and it nevertheless seems like a uniformly useful resource. The only flaws I've experienced came when I thought something was missing--and then it was easy enough to add an example or crossreference link myself. I'm asking because of a conversation in another language-centered community where a worry was expressed that a community-contributed examples website would end up full of junk--bad examples, etc. Supposedly some sites end up that way. What's our secret? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
