I was pretty horrified, when this crossed my timeline. Thanks, Phil, for
starting this thread, because I'd already forgotten about it.
First thing that seems strange, is, that the blog post is from 2015.
Nevertheless, I just tried it on a nashorn repl:
cljs.user> *clojurescript-version*
"1.9.562"
cljs.user> (case 2
x :X
:no-match)
:no-match
cljs.user> (case 'x
x :X
:no-match)
:X
cljs.user> (def ^:const x 2)
#'cljs.user/x
cljs.user> (case 2
x :X
:no-match)
:X
cljs.user> (case 'x
x :X
:no-match)
:no-match
2017-06-18 16:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com>:
> ... that seems wrong.
>
Yes, yes it does.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
