They would be gensymed, but those are a lot harder to read. I added a note about that and cleaned up that section a little more.
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> wrote: > > one question: the explanation of `%` uses macroexpand but shows eg arg1, > arg2, etc. wouldn't those be gen-symed? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
