And, immediately after I sent this, I remembered clojure.tools.trace; which
also looks pretty similar :)

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, lvh <_...@lvh.io> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> I have a piece of code that takes a limited subset of Clojure as queries,
> e.g.:
>
> (not= (some gnarly expr) (some-other-gnarly-expr))
>
> It also produces the result, which is interesting when the query is just
> (some gnarly expr) and the result itself is interesting, but less
> interesting when the top level is  a =/not= call and the result is just
> "true" or "false". I would like to report intermediate values, because they
> tell you _why_ something failed.
>
> So far, I have a few ideas (thanks to clojure slack for adding a few):
>
> * coerce taoensso.timbre/spy, which roughly does what I want, into giving
> me results as data instead of capturing stdout; potentially just using
> with-out-str as a first pass. Problem: some of these expressions are quite
> meaty, and this doesn't give me the option of pretty-printing them.
> * manually instrument the expression with a macro like
> taoensso.timbre/spy, except one that stores values.
> * coerce sayid into doing the same thing (https://bpiel.github.io/sayid/).
> sayid looks like it mostly does what I want, except it's heavily focused on
> editor integration, and I really just want the data.
> * https://github.com/dgrnbrg/spyscope, which appears to do something
> generally similar to what sayid does, but is also really focused on
> editors/human fueled debugging (primarily using reader macros as an
> interface and stdout as output). Obviously reader macros are easy to work
> around :)
>
> Is there anything useful I'm missing, or am I better off just hacking it
> together myself?
>
> I'm already using specter, so instrumenting forms is not a big deal. It's
> always nice to get values as data instead of random strings, but the final
> target is humans, so eventually something is going to get printed.
>
>
> thanks in advance,
> lvh
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to