2017-05-23 23:04 GMT+02:00 Colin Fleming <colin.mailingl...@gmail.com>:
> On 24 May 2017 at 00:13, Herwig Hochleitner <hhochleit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I doubt the whole community would want to move anywhere from Slack. >> > > Perhaps this will have to wait until Slack inevitably throws us off, then. > > What I'm saying is, that the whole community isn't in a single place anyway. Slack happens to be most popular, right now, but we are spread across IRC, gitter / github, slack, mailing lists, discord, stack overflow, reddit and probably many more. IMO trying to move everybody to one thing is an exercise in futility, but consuming / producing to / from all those places through a generic protocol is a realistic hope, as matrix is proving right now. It's a far cry from searching for "cursive" from anywhere in Clojurians, > though. Searching for channels based on some vague criteria seemed > difficult, and searching for Clojure related content across channels is > also a pretty bad experience. > Granted, matrix' search facilities are far from optimal, as of now. But unlike the alternatives, just about everybody could be (and somebody probably is) improving on that. There has been some talk of making a Clojure-related room directory in an > external webpage or something but it's still a kludge. I'm not sure to what > extent this would be fixed if we ran our own room server, but then someone > has to maintain that. > Same. This is currently being worked on: https://github.com/vector-im/riot-web/issues/2454 I'd just like to mention, that in the year or so, that I've been using matrix, the stream of improvements has been pretty steady. So while it might not currently do everything we need, it's the best hope for bridging the community across all the various services that (will continue to) exist. 2017-05-23 23:31 GMT+02:00 Alan Moore <kahunamo...@coopsource.org>: > I watched the matrix video linked above and it seems there is a Slack > bridge that would allow Slack fans to stay put and others to choose their > own client or even go back to IRC. What am I missing? > The slack bridge is working fine, but slack has a nagging limitation of one bridged room per organization or some "monetization incentive" like that. If slack allowed a full bridge, "slackpocalypse" and its message limit would already be a solved problem. Such are the ways of proprietary services ... I too have no skin in this game... I still prefer this mailing list, as is > self evident. I suppose I could build a matrix bridge for Google Groups. > related: https://github.com/turt2live/matrix-email-bot On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Andy Fingerhut <andy.finger...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have no skin in this game, but wasn't the move to Slack pretty much a >> "vote with your feet" combined with word of mouth advertising? It seems to >> me the same could happen to add another on-line chat tool/system, without >> anyone taking a poll/voting on this or any other medium. We'll know when >> it has happened by the rumor mill on Slack, IRC, and/or this email group. >> > Agreed, hence I advertise matrix because I hope more people will see it as a way, better than just a different silo. If "feet" will still choose a silo, there'll be a matrix bridge, as good as silo allows. Hence the risk of choosing wrong is minimized for everybody switching to matrix. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
