The first, and biggest difference that I see, is that a schema is defined as a single string in graphql-clj, but Lacinia uses data structures to describe your graphql schema. The latter being more easily composable, if that's something you need.
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 8:29:24 PM UTC-6, Didier wrote: > > How does this compare to Lacinia? > > On Monday, 24 April 2017 11:24:22 UTC-7, Lei wrote: >> >> graphql-clj is a Clojure library that provides GraphQL implementation. >> >> In this new version 0.2.0, schema and query validator have been >> completely rewritten for simplicity and robustness. APIs have simplified in >> this new version as well. >> >> The github repository is: https://github.com/tendant/graphql-clj >> >> Any comments and advices are welcome! >> >> Cheers, >> Lei >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
