hello, i hope this is the place to discuss questions about Quil (i couldn't find a dedicated forum)
and first of all, kudos to Nikita for this incredible library, which i find even better than the original Processing it's not just a matter of using a different syntax than java, but Nikita actually created something more powerful and flexible than Processing i'm particularly fond of the middleware functionality, which is a stroke of genius: so simple in retrospect and so powerful, opening a whole new way of possibilities of structuring one's own work in a modular fashion so i have one question regarding live coding and middleware if i redefine a function that i associate to :setup, :update or :draw keys, i can see my running sketch changing on the fly, reflecting the new definitions this is not the case however if i redefine a function that i use as a middleware is it an intrinsic limitation? would it be possible to extend the live coding behaviour to middlewares as well? thanks and long live Quil, Jay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.