Alex, I deeply appreciate the diligent virtue policing, but I don't think calling out the Comité de salut public is necessary. There was no attack: I'm much more a Nathan than a Rich person. The world needs both kinds of people. For me, Clojure would have simply been Yet Another Lisp had Nathan not put together Cascalog back in 2010. Yin and Yang.
Given that Rich is the BDFL of Clojure and Clojure is an art project, as someone recently wrote, issues of style are far from irrelevant when discussing what should be in or out of Clojure proper. Edwin On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 10:34:10 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > Edwin, we can have technical discussions about this topic without > comparing Nathan to Rich or making comments about Nathan that may feel like > a personal attack. > > Thanks > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
