On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Matt Moriarity <matt.moriar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > what about memoizing the fitness function? call fitness on your > structs, and if it's memoized, it will return the cached value as long > as the struct is the same value. if it's changed, then it will > recompute. somebody correct me if this doesn't account for something, > but it sounds like the right approach.
Most individuals (except a select few picked through elitism) die every generation. The memoized cache would grow huge and full of obsolete individuals. The mutation constructing function seems obvious in hindsight. I feel stupid now. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
