On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 3:36:53 AM UTC+1, William la Forge wrote: > > Alternative implementations for clojure maps are hard. You tend to use AOT > a lot, which is non-idiomatic. But a number of people have done this, > including myself. In retrospect, it isn't worth it. At least not most of > the time. > One thing that really bothers me is that Java supports subMap. And even > clojure vectors have sub-vec. I've got a lot of code that builds on sub > maps. But without reverting to aot, I need to define my own types which > implement clojure's interfaces. A bit of a pain, but better than reverting > to using aot methinks. >
Can you point out to some implementation of this kind? I don't know what you are referring to here. Would AOT compilation help in my case? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
