Look for https://github.com/Datomic/codeq. Certainly there is more potential to pursue this nowadays with tools.analyzer. There is also an open source Java git implementation which might be worth checking out as a replacement for shelling out.
I find this an interesting topic to explore. Here is an interesting thread on the Erlang board, where Joe Armstrong (the Erlang inventor) also suggested this idea http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2011-May/058768.html - He mentioned it in a recent conversation with Alan Kay. I haven't read it all but it is certainly interesting to study to find out why they didn't implement it - to see if we could do better. (Limitations of erlang vs. limitations of the concept as a whole). On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:39:12 PM UTC+1, Terje Dahl wrote: > > I recall Rich Hickey talking about this a few years back, but can't find > anything about it. > Am I just imaging it? > Or could someone point me in the right direction > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
