Hey, thanks, I like your idea of utilizing closure as poor's man object (or vice versa if you like :) ) to encapsulate particular validators.
However, one note is that I was opting for a more dynamism/flexibility like simply associating field with set of arbitrary composed set of validators. But of course given re-occurring pattern for multiple fields composing them as you suggest is next logical step. And... about performance...that is not an issue currently at all :) Good tips, thanks! On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 7:01:36 AM UTC+1, Herwig Hochleitner wrote: > > Of course, for performance you can optimize that apply+hash-map+interleave > (or even your reduce) into reduce+transients, e.g. by using map-vals > <https://github.com/webnf/webnf/blob/6a2ccaa755e6e40528eb13a5c36bae16ba4947e7/base/src/webnf/kv.clj#L66> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
