I only became aware of this conversation yesterday; hopefully no one was 
looking for my reply earlier…

Anthony was a friend, but our project activity was quite separate. I think 
we had a couple of PRs on each other's projects, but that's about it. I 
don't think I have any particular authority in this area, either. In any 
case, I don't have any bandwidth atm for increasing my involvement in 
general-purpose OSS stuff.

I'd suggest that anyone with an important dependency on one of Anthony's 
projects push them forward independently. At least, don't wait for or rely 
upon other volunteers to coordinate these sorts of things. If there end up 
being multiple forks, etc., that'll work out over time. Especially if you 
represent a ~trusted organization (CircleCI being a reasonable example), 
and are accommodating of others' use cases within reason (i.e. act like a 
sane maintainer), then I suspect others will follow your lead.

The clojars/maven coordinate question is stickier. The clojars folks might 
have general policy, and maybe they've addressed this particular situation 
elsewhere. But, this is an excellent object lesson in how the 
organization/project-name convention is a *good thing*, in contrast to 
effectively single-level namespace coordinates like tentacles/tentacles. 
IMO, a com.circleci/tentacles artifact in clojars would be a far better 
direction; it puts multiple forks (if they end up being necessary) on equal 
footing, and properly reflects the divergence in maintenance.

Thanks for picking up where Anthony left off,

- Chas

On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 7:41:46 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> I have no authority to speak on this, but I think it would be nice to see 
> a consensus fork managed by some one or ones with a vested interest in it. 
> (I also have used tentacles off and on.)
>
> Maybe another option would be to create a github org of some people that 
> can act as admins. I'd nominate Chas as someone to act in that capacity 
> given his relationship with raynes.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to