On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 2:37:22 PM UTC-5, Beau Fabry wrote: > > With specter: > > (map-indexed (fn [i name] (sp/transform sp/MAP-VALS #(nth % i) optij)) > (:name optij)) > => ({:name :tom, :age 1, :tone :do} {:name :dick, :age 2, :tone :re} > {:name :harry, :age 3, :tone :mi}) >
One line! With specter, but still nice. But to me this is the downside of specter and even Clojure: the code starts to get opaque. I am reminded of the C Puzzle Book which offered simple data and a few lines of code and defied us to guess what the code produced. My big take-away here is map-indexed. Forgot about that and it would have greatly simplified my original efforts. > > Without: > > (map-indexed (fn [i name] (into {} (map (fn [[k v]] [k (nth v i)]) > optij))) (:name optij)) > => ({:name :tom, :age 1, :tone :do} {:name :dick, :age 2, :tone :re} > {:name :harry, :age 3, :tone :mi}) > > Gonna have to study that one. :) Still one line, tho! Cool. -kt > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.