I think it's unlikely that this has to do with CLJ-703. But certainly, if you could find a version that doesn't exhibit the problem that would be interesting.
On Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 3:11:37 PM UTC-6, Matching Socks wrote: > > You will eventually have to whittle it down to a minimal, reproducible > case and file it in Jira. But if you are inclined first to entertain some > wild and irresponsible speculation, then perhaps the problem might be > related to the fix for CLJ-703, and it would work better to use the Clojure > 1.7 compiler? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
