> On Jan 1, 2017, at 7:13 PM, John Schmidt <john.schmid...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Steve: both ::game3 and ::game4 from your suggestions result in the same > error. >
Sorry for my mistaken conjecture. My issue with the macroexpansion looks like a red herring. I guess I confused myself with quick tests in the REPL. The problem seems to be sensitive to the order of the declaration of the predicates versus the protocol extension. That is, it seems to work for me if I do the extend-type Foo before defining the predicates that refer to the protocol. I probably did this accidentally while playing in the REPL. So now I think the issue is that one version of the protocol was captured by the “early" predicates, and then the protocol itself was changed so references to the “old” protocol (with the same name) no longer worked. The #(…) closure seems to do the right thing as the protocol symbol doesn’t get evaluated at definition time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
