On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, samppi <rbysam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Small questions on error-kit—which I love and think that all clojure- > contrib libraries should use—why do defined errors such as *error*, > *number-error*, etc. have names surrounded by asterisks?
Thanks for the endorsement! Have you used continue or bind-continue yet? These are the features I'm less certain about. Your question is a very good one. Early versions actually rebound the error Vars, so I named them appropriately. Of course that's not exactly how it works anymore, but I grew accustomed to how they look with earmuffs, and didn't change them. I'm hesitant to remove them because I like how they stand out in the code. Perhaps it's not really necessary, or perhaps there's a better naming convention we could use? Any thoughts? --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
