I am wrestling the sequences chapter of the book into conformance with the new laziness, and I am finding it tricky to infer accurate definitions of the words sequence, seq (noun), seq (function), and ISeq from the variety of extant documentation, code, email chats, and IRC logs. I would appreciate comments and corrections to the following statements.
(1) The book currently claims that "sequence" and "seq" are synonyms. This is consistent with http://clojure.org/sequences, but not with recent threads here. Is it more accurate to say that a sequence is a seq-able collection? (2) Is it correct to say that seq (noun) and ISeq are synonyms? I take this from http://clojure.org/lazy: "seqs can be empty * always an ISeq" Thanks, Stu --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
