What about 'conj'? Documentation says: (conj nil item) returns (item). Currently: user=> (conj nil 1) (1) user=> (conj () 1) (1)
Idiom "conj nil" is used in 'reverse': (reduce conj nil coll) Currently: user=> (reverse [1 2]) (2 1) user=> (reverse [1]) (1) user=> (reverse []) nil It looks that now all sequence functions return () instead of nil. Is 'reverse' correct? Thank you, Frantisek On Feb 17, 8:43 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've merged the lazy branch into trunk, SVN rev 1287 > > Please do not rush to this version unless you are a library/tool > developer. Let them do their ports and chime in on their progress. > Move only when the libs/tools you depend upon have been ported. > > Thanks to all for your feedback and input! > > Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
