Since -social might imply the normal channel is .. err .. not (which
would be most inaccurate!), how about #clojure-cafe?

- Haskell has a "Cafe" forum / mailing list
- Additional cute point: the first 16-bit of a Java class file is
0xCAFE

Best regards,

--
Michel S.

On Feb 17, 11:27 am, Rayne <disciplera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Names really weren't my priority here. I'll be happy to link -offtopic
> to another channel with a different name if someone thinks of a better
> name somewhere down the road ^_^.
>
> On Feb 17, 10:15 am, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
>
> > I actually think that #clojure is very active.  Of the channels I  
> > frequent/lurk in, only #git regularly surpasses #clojure in number of  
> > messages per (my) day. Maybe that says more about my irc interests, so  
> > take that as you will.
>
> > #clojure-offtopic doesn't have much poetry to it, but I'll keep out of  
> > naming stuffs.
>
> > - Chas
>
> > On Feb 17, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Rayne wrote:
>
> > > A week or 2 ago, Lau_Of_DK asked me very nicely to stop talking so  
> > > off-
> > > topic in #Clojure. I mentioned that we should have an Off-topic
> > > channel for people who would just like to talk, because just about
> > > every other language's channel on freenode has an off topic channel
> > > (#haskell-blah for instance). He said it has been discussed and
> > > because of the low volume of #clojure (which isn't so low if you think
> > > about it), it would not be a good idea. I just went along with that.
> > > But today I thought about it, and I haven't seen it discussed and if
> > > it has been discussed here before I'm sorry, but I'd like other
> > > peoples input on this. I feel that making an off topic channel for
> > > Clojurists would not effect the volume of #Clojure in any way. In fact
> > > I feel that it would remove any current, or future extensive off topic
> > > chatter in #Clojure and help to keep things on tract. If people want
> > > to talk off topic they can come to the off topic channel, and if they
> > > don't want to talk about #Clojure, they probably wouldn't be there in
> > > the first place. How would it effect #Clojure's volume? I personally
> > > think having an off topic channel is a great idea, but it's not my
> > > language and #Clojure isn't my channel.
>
> > > I have made a channel on freenode called #Clojure-Offtopic for now it
> > > is explicitly marked as unofficial and waiting for Rich Hickey's
> > > approval. If for some reason, you guys /really/ don't want an off
> > > topic channel, I have respect enough to remove the channel for you
> > > guys. I will not announce this channel in #Clojure until I have the
> > > communities approval. It seems I've attracted durka to the channel
> > > somehow though :p.
>
> > > I'm sorry if this topic isn't right for this group, but I'm not sure
> > > where else I should discuss it.
>
> > > -Rayne
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to