> What I see in your example is binding, but I don't see with-local- > vars anywhere. Or did I misunderstand something?
Sorry, I checked the compojure source again and the servlet headers, cookies, etc are wrapped in a "with-servlet-vars" macro (rather than with-local-vars) which just uses let. The html parameters are wrapped in *params* using binding rather than with-local-vars, so my example does not actually demonstrate with-local-vars, but rather just thread-local use of vars with binding. On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@laposte.net> wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2009, at 15:35, Adrian Cuthbertson wrote: > >> Have a look at compojure - a good example of with-local-vars is where >> a servlet request is executed. Each (get, post) request occurs in its >> entirety on a single (jetty or tomcat) thread. The compojure call to >> the application service function binds the http headers, servlet >> request parameters, etc, using with-local-vars and then calls the app >> function. These values are all then in scope for the called service >> function _and_ any functions that it in turn calls. This is all safe >> without using refs/atoms as the values are all "local-thread" bound. > > What I see in your example is binding, but I don't see with-local- > vars anywhere. Or did I misunderstand something? > > Konrad. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
