On Feb 10, 10:14 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim <straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> wrote: > This one is easy: > > (and this that the-other-thing) > > and is short-circuting, e.g. it returns nil/false on reaching the first > nil/false element, or the value of the last element. > > I used it tonight like this: > > (and x (inc x)) > > This returns x+1, unless x is nil, in which case it returns nil. > > Make sense? >
Yes, perfect sense. Seems so bloody obvious now--don't know why I never thought to look for (and) on the Clojure website. Thanks for the assist. -- Onorio Catenacci III --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
