Good. This one concerned me, as I'd like to use pmap given its simplicity, but that would prevent other from calling my code in their own pmap (and how would they know not to do that). On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 7, 9:36 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim <straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > With the help of the IRC folks I solved my own problem. > > > > I thought I'd share my findings: > > > > You cannot safely call pmap inside of another pmap function. Because > > pmap is implemented on top of agents, the actual calls to your > > function are agent sends. When a send happens *inside* of another > > agent function, it is delayed until the outer function returns. > > I've added futures in SVN 1253 and implemented pmap in terms of > futures, which should allow for arbitrary nesting of pmap calls. > > Rich > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
