I'd vote for that -- after the powers that be are happy with a name. It would be very useful to me.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Jeffrey Straszheim > <straszheimjeff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there a reason the assert-args macro is private to core? It seems > like > > it would be generally useful. > > It was originally included without the normal amount of deliberation > on naming and API that most core functions and macros go through. > Keeping it private means its name and API can be improved without > breaking anyone else's code. > > I suppose if everyone thinks its good enough as-is, we can petition > Rich to make it public. > > --Chouser > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
