This may be obvious to others, but what's the motivation behind it? Is it that we are very concerned about combatting the criticism that lisp has too many parens?
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, kkw <kevin.k....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi sun, > > I thought this question looked familiar. I found some answers here > also: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/1f21663ea1ae9f58/ > > Kev > > On Feb 2, 2:29 am, Adrian Cuthbertson <adrian.cuthbert...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Sorry! That should have read; > > (-> m :one :b) > > 2 > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:13 PM, e <evier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I was able to work through the first two examples, and thanks for > those. I > > > will have to study maps more, I guess, to understand the last one. I > don't > > > know where 'x' came from: > > > > >> user=> (-> x :one :b) > > >> 2- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
