On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jan Rychter <j...@rychter.com> wrote:
> From what I read, the reasoning is that Clojure provides extremely > general multimethods where you have to define a dispatch function. On > the object side, there is metadata and you can do with it whatever you > want. But this seems to leave a gaping hole saying "fill me with an > object system". Is the goal for everyone to roll their own? Hi, Just curious, have you seen the "a la carte hierarchies" scheme that Rich worked up last summer? http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/9cc9926de1bdb128?pli=1 Best, Graham --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
