Hi! Am 29.01.2009 um 23:52 schrieb Mark Volkmann:
> I'd like for that to be moved to core so I don't have to load it ... > which is also verbose for something that is commonly needed. "includes?" being commonly needed might indicate that people really should be using sets instead of lists or vectors in these cases. Sets are the only data structures that provide efficient contains?(-value), plus contains? works as expected with sets. My guess is that the omission of includes? in core is not an oversight after all, but an incentive to pick the right data structure for the task at hand. Kind regards, achim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
