> > Well, it's the combination of a seq being persistent and a stream > being one-pass - to realize the seq you'll need that pass.
could be implemented still doing that pass . . . and --> This may be where you are headed in the To Be Continued, but it out to be possible to wrap a sequence with a generator that then makes it work like a stream again. > Also, seqs > are an acceptable escaping value from the stream mechanism. > I'm puzzling on this. Are you saying the problem is that then someone could hand in the very sequence they made from a given stream when they are getting an iterator? Hmmmmm. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
