On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi <squee...@mac.com> wrote: > > I recommend that proposed changes for clojure-contrib be tracked as > clojure-contrib issues.
I agree. > My understanding of the issue policy for Clojure is that Rich would still > like to approve them either here or on #clojure (irc) before they're > entered. (ref: his recent posting on the topic.) I'm not aware of whether or > not he has approved entering issue(s) in this case. That's a very interesting point. My impression has been that lack of objection from him here (or on IRC) is sufficient approval to post something on the issues page. If he was completely opposed to these proposals, he's had several days to make his opinion known. Of course that's no guarantee that the issue or any particular patch will be approved, but it makes sure that issues and proposed patches aren't lost in archives. Hopefully Rich will clarify his wishes on this. --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
