On Jan 19, 12:47 pm, Michael Reid <kid.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting, I did not know this. But this seems to remove some > flexibility in allowing for "duck" typing.
Yes, that's a disadvantage with duck typing in most dynamic languages -- types have to be resolved at run-time. In the case of Java, that means you have to accept reflection-based method calls. -Stuart Sierra --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
