On Jan 19, 11:59 am, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > But my version also only allows matches on the method name (not on > return value or argument class names). At first I thought this was > also good, but now I'm less sure. How often do you think you'd want > to be able to search on a method's argument names, vs. how many > unhelpful matches you'd get doing (show String "string") ? Opintions?
Would it be possible to separate "show" into two functions, one of which returns a sequence of method signatures and another which prints them? Then you could filter the sequence however you like. -Stuart Sierra --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
