On Jan 18, 6:56 pm, Anand Patil <anand.prabhakar.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would it make any sense to make @ polymorphic so that @x return x's > value when x is a var rather than raising an error?
Actually, it already is: user> (def x 5) #'user/x user> (deref (var x)) 5 user> @(var x) 5 @x is just shorthand for (deref x), which resolves to (deref 5), which doesn't make sense. -Stuart Sierra --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
