On Jan 13, 4:45 am, Mark McGranaghan <mmcgr...@gmail.com> wrote: > In terms of Clojure web frameworks, I think that there is a lot to be > gained by leveraging the Ring interface, especially from the modular > functionality provided by Ring middleware. I'd like in particular to > be able to run Compojure apps in Ring - if the users and authors of > Compojure are interested I'd be happy to work with them to see what we > can do.
I think it's a good idea in principle to have a common functional way of accessing servlets. However, I notice there's still some wheel reinventing going on. The HttpServlet API provides methods for parameters, cookies and sessions, but these are absent from Ring. I notice that in your weld framework, you implement these pieces of functionality in Clojure, but why? I can understand keeping a low- level interface lightweight, but Ring appears to be lightweight than the Servlet API it's based upon. Other than that, I generally like what I see in Ring. It uses Clojure data structures, is functional, and is refreshingly explicit. - James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
