On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Brian Doyle <brianpdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:34 AM, James Reeves > <weavejes...@googlemail.com>wrote: > >> >> On Jan 8, 5:05 pm, "Brian Doyle" <brianpdo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I incorporated most of James ideas but I don't like the name >> pipe-stream. >> >> Then wouldn't copy-stream be better? write-stream isn't specific >> enough, IMO. >> > > Sure, write-stream works for me. > Sorry, I meant that copy-stream works for me. It's been a long day already :( > > > >> >> Also, I don't think there's a huge amount of gain to be had from an >> Integer type hint in this case, since it's only used once, or for two >> sets of type hints for the same function. > > > Agreed. I had hinted on the other params and just thought I'd do it for > the Integer type as well. > > >> >> >> - James >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
