Chouser a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> 
> wrote:
>   
>> Chouser a écrit :
>>     
>>> This isn't in clojure.core yet (any reason why not?) so would you mind
>>> if I add it to clojure.contrib.seq-utils?  Or of course you can do it
>>> if you prefer.  :-)
>> hat do you think of adding rec-cons, rec-cat and your (fixed) cute
>> version instead to seq-utils?
>> (see http://clj-me.blogspot.com/2009/01/recursive-seqs.html for rec-cat
>> and rec-cons)
>>     
>
> That'd be fine too, especially for rec-cons and rec-cat.  
Stuart,

Do you think rec-cat, rec-cons and reductions belong to seq-utils?

Christophe

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to