Instead of throwing a1..aN around every time, you could use the result vector and use destructuring binding in your let clause to get a1..aN into that scope.
Something like (let [[a1 a2 aN :as result] (your-func ...)] ...) On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:57 PM, TPJ <tpri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there some better way to "call" recur than that: > > (loop [ arg1 value1 > arg2 value2 > ... > argn valuen ] > (...) ; some stuff here > (let [ (...) ; some bindings here > result (my-func ...) > a1 (nth result 0) > a2 (nth result 1) > ... > an (nth result (- n 1)) ] > (recur a1 a2 ... an))) > > I'd like to get rid of this a1, a2, ..., an and "call" recur in some > more convenient way. I've tried (apply recur result), but without any > success (Unable to resolve symbol: recur in this context). > > > -- Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, Christian Vest Hansen. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
