> From the Repl try: (.printStackTrace *e) Thanks!
>> The thing is, I want to store the actual *function* not the symbol >> referencing the function (the symbol's reference changes after the >> macro is evaluated). > > 1:10 user=> (defmacro tracefn > "Creates trace logging of calls to a function." > [function-name] > `(def ~function-name > (let [old-function# ~function-name] > (fn [& args#] > (println args#) > (print " ") > (let [ret-val# (apply old-function# args#)] > (println ret-val#) > ret-val#))))) > nil > 1:21 user=> (defn foo [x] (inc x)) > #'user/foo > 1:22 user=> (macroexpand-1 '(tracefn foo)) > (def foo (clojure.core/let [old-function__28__auto__ foo] (clojure.core/fn > [& args__29__auto__] (clojure.core/println args__29__auto__) > (clojure.core/print " ") (clojure.core/let [ret-val__30__auto__ > (clojure.core/apply old-function__28__auto__ args__29__auto__)] > (clojure.core/println ret-val__30__auto__) ret-val__30__auto__)))) Ok, so I guess it was the eval that was tripping it up. Do function "objects" not resolve to themselves in clojure? I think I'll try printing the stacktrace and looking at why the code was breaking on the eval'd value. >> Is that just to give the user flexibility on whether they want to >> flush on new line? Or is there some other reason to choose prn over >> println? > > 1:6 user=> (println "foo") > foo > nil > 1:7 user=> (prn "foo") > "foo" > nil > 1:8 user=> (println \space) > > nil > 1:9 user=> (prn \space) > \space > nil > > I would prefer prn. Point taken :). Thank you! --Eric Tschetter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
